No. 20-217
Richard Balter v. United States
Tags: expert-witness federal-tort-claims-act medical-malpractice proximate-cause standard-of-care virginia-medical-malpractice-act
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Virginia Medical Malpractice Act's requirement apply to a medical malpractice claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Virginia Medical Malpractice Act’s requirement that a plaintiff possess a written opinion signed by an expert witness that, based upon a reasonable understanding of the facts, the defendant for whom service of process has been requested deviated from the applicable standard of care and the deviation was a : proximate cause of the injuries claimed apply to a medical malpractice claim brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-25
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 25, 2020.
2020-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 26, 2020 to November 25, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 26, 2020.
2020-08-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2020 to October 26, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)
Attorneys
Richard Balter
Richard Balter — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent