No. 20-218
Isidro Abascal-Montalvo v. City of New York, New York
Tags: cause-of-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process false-arrest mental-hygiene-law organized-stalking remote-electronic-assault standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's causes of action relating to organized-stalking and remote-electronic-assaults are not inherently-incredible and state-a-cause-of-action
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED WHETHER PETITIONER’S CAUSES OF ACTION RELATING TO ORGANIZED STALKING AND REMOTE ELECTRONIC ASSAULTS ARE NOT INHERENTLY INCREDIBLE AND STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION. . WHETHER CAUSES OF ACTION RELATING TO FALSE ARREST, ASSAULT, AND BATTERY ARISING FROM PETITIONER’S ALLEGED CONFINEMENT ON OCTOBER . 24, 2014 IS PRIVILEGED UNDER MENTAL HYGIENE LAW § 9.4. WHETHER CAUSES OF ACTION PERTAINING TO EVENTS PRIOR TO OCTOBER 23, 2014 ARE NOT TIME-BARRED AS BEYOND THE STATURE [SIC] OF LIMITATIONS. i
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 24, 2020)