Whether Board decisions that are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the Board's statutory jurisdiction from the start, and are made by administrative patent judges holding that position in violation of the Appointments Clause, which decisions are not reviewed by any principal officer in the Executive Branch, are also precluded from review by an Art. III court

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented are: 1. Whether Board decisions that are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the Board’s statutory jurisdiction from the start, and are made by administrative patent judges holding that position in violation of the Appointments Clause, which decisions are not reviewed by any principal officer in the Executive Branch, are also precluded from review by an Art. III court. 2. Whether the Federal Circuit’s ruling in ESIP Series 2, LLC v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC, 958 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2020) improperly extends the scope of Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Techs., LP, 140 8.Ct. 1867 (2020).