No. 20-233
Hmong 2, et al. v. United States, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: breach-of-promise civil-procedure constitutional-law exception judicial-review justiciability non-justiciable political-question political-question-doctrine separation-of-powers standing treaty-interpretation
Key Terms:
Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should establish a breach of promise exception to the non-justiciable political question rule?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court should establish a breach of promise exception to the non-justiciable political question rule? 2. Whether the Court should establish a breach of treaty exception to the non-justiciable political question rule? 3. Whether the Court should establish a war crimes exception to the non-justiciable political question rule?
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Hmong 2, et al.
Herman A.D. Franck — Franck & Associates, Petitioner
Herman A.D. Franck — Franck & Associates, Petitioner
United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent