No. 20-235
Edward J. Mierzwa v. Arkadiusz M. Dudek, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure court-manipulation due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure racketeering supervisory-powers supreme-court-jurisdiction unlawful-process
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Will the Supreme Court exercise its supervisory powers to remedy the unlawful process enacted by the Lower Courts to substitute racketeering-based court manipulation in lieu of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented As the Court of Last Resort, will the Supreme Court of the United States exercise its supervisory powers to remedy the unlawful process, enacted by the Lower Courts, to substitute racketeering-based court manipulation in lieu of the prescribed Federal Rules of Civil Procedure? ii
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent Arkadiusz M. Dudek to respond filed.
2020-04-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2020)
2020-02-19
Application (19A895) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until April 27, 2020.
2020-01-29
Application (19A895) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 27, 2020 to April 27, 2020, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Arkadiusz M. Dudek
David Mark Paris — Piro Zinna Cifelli Paris & Genitempo, LLC, Respondent
David Mark Paris — Piro Zinna Cifelli Paris & Genitempo, LLC, Respondent
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent