No. 20-253

Christopher Castagna, et al. v. Harry Jean, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: community-caretaking fourth-amendment home-sanctity police-intrusion qualified-immunity sanctity-of-home search-and-seizure warrantless-entry
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the community caretaking exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement applies to warrantless, unconsented-to entries by police officers into private homes

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a)) The Third and Seventh Circuits have held that the community caretaking exception established by Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (1973) does not apply to warrantless, unconsented to entries by police officers into private homes. The First Circuit held that the exception does apply to such entries. Was the First Circuit wrong? Having so found, the First Circuit granted the officers qualified immunity upon finding that, as of March 17, 2013, it was not clearly established that the police officers’ warrantless, unconsented-to entry into a private home to demand music be turned down and to check on suspected, but unconfirmed, underage drinkers fell outside the ambit of the community caretaking exception. Where the Fourth Amendment’s heightened protections for the sanctity of the home have been clearly established for centuries, may the doctrine of qualified immunity be stretched so far as to condone such an objectively unreasonable intrusion? Should it? i

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-30
Letter of November 30, 2020 from counsel for petitioner submitted.
2020-11-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-09
Reply of petitioners Christopher Castagna, et al. filed.
2020-11-02
Brief of respondents Harry Jean, Keith Kaplan, and Daran Edwards in opposition filed.
2020-09-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 1, 2020 to November 2, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 2, 2020.
2020-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2020)

Attorneys

Christopher Castagna, et al.
Paul J. KlehmKrasnoo, Klehm & Falkner LLP, Petitioner
Paul J. KlehmKrasnoo, Klehm & Falkner LLP, Petitioner
Harry Jean, Keith Kaplan, and Daran Edwards
Nicole Marie O'ConnorCity of Boston Law Department, Respondent
Nicole Marie O'ConnorCity of Boston Law Department, Respondent
Nicole M. O'ConnorCity of Boston Law Department, Respondent
Nicole M. O'ConnorCity of Boston Law Department, Respondent