No. 20-254
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (3)
Tags: civil-rights competence-restoration criminal-action criminal-procedure district-court due-process federal-tort-claims-act habeas-corpus judicial-procedure standing
Latest Conference:
2021-01-15
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should a three-judge court instead of a single judge at the North Carolina district court adjudge the FTCA case?
2. Does denial of certiorari justify dismissal of said FTCA case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a three-judge court should have adjudged the FTCA case
Docket Entries
2021-01-19
Rehearing DENIED. The Chief Justice, Justice Breyer and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-12-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.
2020-12-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-11-23
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice, Justice Breyer, and Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-11-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-16
Rescheduled.
2020-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent Roberts, Chief Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2020)
Attorneys
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young — Petitioner
Roberts, Chief Justice, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent