Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued

QUESTIONS PRESENTED QUESTION I. I. Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued to the 11 Circuit and Joan Lenard, a federal district court judge in the Southern District of Florida prohibiting execution of a void, ex parte, fraudulent, extrajudicial $1,700,000 judgment (the “Ex Parte Judgment”) that perpetrates proven crimes, extortion, fraud on the court and a scheme to defraud by Respondent, Roy R. Lustig, falling within the definition of a criminal enterprise wherein Petitioner’s home, life savings and personal property have been illegally embezzled by Respondent as a result of his own criminal activities that are irrefutably proven by official, certified Secretary of State records, affidavits and court filings; and Should a Writ of Mandamus be issued to the 11* Circuit and to Joan Lenard requiring them to vacate the extrajudicial Ex Parte Judgment and to order Respondent to return all assets and property illegally seized from Petitioner. QUESTION IT Il. Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued to the 11t* Circuit and Joan Lenard, a federal district court judge in the Southern District of Florida prohibiting the enforcement of an ex parte, extrajudicial, unconstitutional order (the “Ex Parte Rights Extinguishment Order”) that: A. Attempts and purports to eviscerate the jurisdiction of this Supreme Court; B. Extra-judicially and unconstitutionally strips Petitioner and her attorney, of their fundamental, inalienable Constitutional rights to access any federal , or state court and to sue and defend not only in that judge’s judicial district but extra-judicially in all other districts, all circuit courts, all state courts, and all bankruptcy courts throughout the U.S. and in this Supreme Court; C. Extra-judicially subjects Petitioner and her attorney to life-threatening danger by prohibiting them from reporting crimes by Respondent and extrajudicially shields Respondent from his criminal acts; and u" Should a Writ of Mandamus also be issued to the 11 Circuit requiring it to vacate that Ex Parte Rights Extinguishment Order. QUESTION III II. Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued to Laurel Isicoff, a non-Article III bankruptcy court judge in the Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court prohibiting her jurisdiction-less execution of the Ex Parte Judgment referenced in Question I by issuing collusive unlawful, void, extrajudicial orders (the “Extrajudicial Bankruptcy Orders”) to perpetrate Respondent’s | fraudulent claim filed in bankruptcy court using the fraudulent Ex Parte | Judgment (where Petitioner has been forced into an involuntary bankruptcy , as a result of the Ex Parte Judgment); and | Should a Writ of Mandamus be issued requiring Laurel Isicoff to vacate the Extrajudicial Bankruptcy Orders and requiring her to order Respondent, the trustee, the attorney for the trustee and all other involved parties to return Petitioner’s illegally seized life savings, assets and property. QUESTION IV IV. Should a Writ of Prohibition be issued prohibiting disqualified Judge Carol Lisa Phillips, in the 17+ Circuit Court in Broward County, Florida and Judge Milton Hirsch, in the 11 Circuit Court in Miami-Dade, Florida from presiding in cases (that are inextricably intertwined with Respondent’s criminal activities in the Southern District Court of Florida and the Southern : District of Florida Bankruptcy Court set forth in Questions I, IT and III) where they are disqualified as a matter of law and fact and from exercising ultra vires powers when they refuse to comply with law mandating their : disqualification and are extra judicially violating Petitioner’s fundamental, inalienable Constitutional and due process rights to access to and meaningful due process in a proper court before a qualified judge. : iti CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 14, the following is a list of all