Whether the U.S. Government's wrongful possession of a tainted, unlawful void title due to clear violations of federal and Florida laws is acceptable

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This Court directs all courts that preventing manifest injustice and preserving the public’s trust in the legal system are of upmost importance. Equally important is the proper adjudication of matters involving the U.S. Government, which are exclusive to this Court and its federal courts byway of the U.S. Constitution. But as witnessed herein and all too often, state courts have improperly misadjudicated the exclusive federal claims within millions of American’s unlawful foreclosures, many by wrongdoer and unlawful foreclosure predator Wells Fargo. It is undeniable the U.S. Government is the real party in interest of millions of Americans unlawful foreclosures thru its financial agent Fannie Mae as confirmed within Treasury documents and confirmed by Wells Fargo in filings herein. After a decade of defending her family’s constitutional rights in multiple federal and state courts, along with countless stories from American victims it is clear, manifest injustice, doing the right thing and upholding the law are not priority over further concealment of numerous unlawful actions that ultimately financially benefit the U.S. Government. So, taxpayers are liable for millions of un‘lawful foreclosures removing countless American families from their constitutionally protected homes byway of the Greatest mass fraud and coverup in history. This case raises vital constitutional issues over the govern: ment’s direct financial interest in millions of unlawful foreclosures, securities laws, Constitutional property ; rights, foreclosure and modification fraud, standing ; and void judgements. This case raises issues of proper adjudication and enforcement of FL laws that have allowed the to be in possession of a tainted unlawful and void title to the Barone’s home. Thus, the questions presented are: ; ii , 1. Whether U.S. Government’s wrongful possession : of a tainted, unlawful void title due to clear violations of federal and Florida laws, including criminal Trespassing, Breaking & Entering, Changing Locks to lock the Barone’s out of their home, Destruction of Property and posting unlawful notices on behalf of the government & its agent is acceptable to this High Court? 2. Whether U.S. Government’s undeniable exclusive benefit from millions of unlawful foreclosures thru financial agent Fannie Mae, subject it to federal jurisdiction and property “takings” clause of the Constitution? 3. Whether common law, the U.C.C., prior holdings of this Court and the FL Supreme Court prohibit Wells Fargo and third parties from initiating foreclosures when they are not the true owner of the debt owed and therefore have not sustained financial injury? 4, Whether selling and/or pledging millions of homeowners’ property as collateral numerous times without consent and disclosure thru RMBS securitizations and rehypothecations of alleged mortgage notes is unlawful, ; unconstitutional and violate SEC securities laws and NEMO DAT QUOD NON HABET? And whether the alleged mortgages are in fact securities transactions? 5. Whether the appeals court violated Cares Act Sections 4022 & 4024 prohibiting furthering foreclosures and evictions by unfairly dismissing the appeal with prejudice? And whether its false claims of frivolous and ; threat of sanctions on valid federal claims exclusive to this Supreme Court must be immediately reversed?