Whether Judges, Prosecutors and other officials can be held liable for either Equity and/or Legal relief

No question identified. : Questions/Issues for Review Whether Judges, Prosecutors and other officials can be held liable for either Equity and/or Legal relief for any of the following reasons. . 1. Their actions were as a result of lack of, loss of or usurpation of Jurisdicion and/or Discretion. . 2. They have Common Law Mandates placed upon them that barred them from not complying with the Common Law under 7 such rights. . . 3. Whether another court can validate a claim of lack of, usurpation of or loss of Jurisdiction and/or Discretion which is always open to inquiry; is entitled to relief from void orders even before the proceedings are declared void; whether such issues are for the Jury and not the Judge; Whether the fraud of failure to recuse, failure to comply with Common Law mandates or trying and sentencing an alleged felon on alleged crimes when the indictment of said crimes were not procured properly and thus if these frauds occur, is the jury the proper venue to determine the frauds in accordance with the case of State v Zisa, N.J. App. Court, 2015 and whether such law and facts allows for a dismissal of a lawsuit under Rule 12(b) issues or is the plaintiff at least entitled to discovery or a plenary hearing? 4. Given this court’s decision in U.S. v Beggerly, 524 U.S. 38, 42-45, 1998, since the State Courts have ruled the PCR Motions were untimely, the only process available to rectify the void proceedings is by way of a Collateral attack and the lower courts have denied this right. And ; 5. Are Police officers and public defenders liable for conspiring with judges and/or prosecutors, and if yes, should a lawsuit be dismissed in its entirety? = i