No. 20-310

Robert James Keach, Estate Representative of Post-Effective Date Estate of Montreal, Maine, and Atlantic Railway, Ltd. v. New Brunswick Southern Railway Company, Ltd., et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: bankruptcy-code federal-equity-receivership fosdick-v-schall priority-of-payment priority-payment railroad-reorganization six-months-rule unsecured-claims
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 'six months rule' entitles unsecured claims for necessary operating expenses incurred by a railroad in the six months before bankruptcy to priority of payment if the railroad has not diverted any income away from the payment of such claims to pay secured creditors

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Section 1171(b) of the Bankruptcy Code grants payment priority to unsecured claims in railroad reorganizations if such claims “would have been entitled to priority” in a federal equity receivership. 11 U.S.C. §1171(b). This provision codifies the “six months rule” established in pre-Code railroad receivership cases, which granted a special priority to certain unsecured claims of creditors that provided goods or services necessary to the railroad’s operation, in reliance on payment out of the railroad’s current income, in the six months before the receivership. Fosdick v. Schall, 99 U.S. 235, 252-254 (1879). Under Fosdick, such unsecured claims for operating expenses were entitled to priority in payment, ahead of secured creditors, only if the railroad had diverted income that should have been used to pay such claims to pay secured creditors instead. See id. The question presented, on which the courts of appeals are divided, is: Whether the “six months rule” entitles unsecured claims for necessary operating expenses incurred by a railroad in the six months before bankruptcy to priority of payment if the railroad has not diverted any income away from the payment of such claims to pay secured creditors. @

Docket Entries

2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-27
Reply of petitioners Robert James Keach, Estate Representative of the Post-Effective Date Estate of Montreal, Maine, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-10-09
Brief of respondents New Brunswick Southern Railway Company Limited and Maine Northern Railway Company in opposition filed.
2020-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2020)

Attorneys

New Brunswick Southern Railway Company Limited and Maine Northern Railway Company
Alan Roger LepeneThompson Hine LLP, Respondent
Alan Roger LepeneThompson Hine LLP, Respondent
James Joseph HendersonThompson Hine LLP, Respondent
James Joseph HendersonThompson Hine LLP, Respondent
Robert James Keach, Estate Representative of the Post-Effective Date Estate of Montreal, Maine, and Atlantic Railway, Ltd.
Danielle Mary SpinelliWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner
Danielle Mary SpinelliWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Petitioner