No. 20-317
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure dna-evidence evidence-admissibility multi-analyst-testing out-of-court-statements testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-03-05
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause permits DNA evidence obtained as the result of a multi-analyst testing process to be introduced against the defendant at trial through one of the testing analysts who has no personal knowledge of the basis for the out-of-court testimonial statements made by the other nontestifying analysts who participated in the testing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Confrontation Clause permits DNA evidence obtained as the result of a multi-analyst testing process to be introduced against the defendant at trial through one of the testing analysts who has no personal knowledge of the basis for the out-of-court testimonial statements made by the other nontestifying analysts who participated in the testing.
Docket Entries
2021-03-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in <i>Stuart</i> v. <i>Alabama</i>, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting).
2021-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-11-20
Reply of petitioner Dakai Chavis filed.
2020-11-09
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until November 24, 2020 granted.
2020-11-05
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from November 17, 2020 to November 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-28
Brief of respondent Delaware in opposition filed.
2020-09-28
Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2020)
2020-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-22
Waiver of right of respondent Delaware to respond filed.
2020-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Dakai Chavis
E. Joshua Rosenkranz — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
E. Joshua Rosenkranz — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
Delaware