No. 20-318
Equal Means Equal, et al. v. David S. Ferriero, Archivist of the United States
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Equal Rights Amendment is now the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because three-fourths of the States have ratified it?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Equal Rights Amendment is now the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because three-fourths of the States have ratified it? 2. Whether the Archivist of the United States violated his duty under Article V of the Constitution and 1 U.S.C. § 106b by refusing to publish the Equal Rights Amendment after he was notified that threefourths of the States ratified it? 3. Whether Petitioners have Article III standing?
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-02
Brief amici curiae of Eighty Diverse filed. (Distributed)(10/2/2020)
2020-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent Ferriero, David S. to respond filed.
2020-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Equal Means Equal, et al.
Wendy J. Murphy — New England Law | Boston, Petitioner
Wendy J. Murphy — New England Law | Boston, Petitioner
Ferriero, David S.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
MadMoms, et al.