No. 20-324

Peter J. Barclay v. Oregon Department of Justice, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: constitutional-sovereignty federal-preemption judicial-accountability judicial-immunity stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-injunction statutory-injunctions supervisory-powers
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity ERISA
Latest Conference: 2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Will this Court exercise its supervisory powers against lower court judgments which expressly hold the stare decisis of this Court 'irrelevant' and where the lower courts disregard this Court's stare decisis by refusing to hold state judges culpable for committing manifest violations of U.S. sovereignty in the face of the clear statutes and this courts cases that strip state judges of authority?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented For Review Will this Court exercise its supervisory powers against lower court judgments which expressly hold the stare decisis of this Court “irrelevant” and where the lower courts disregard this Court’s stare decisis by refusing to hold state judges culpable for committing manifest violations of U.S. sovereignty in the face of the clear statutes and this courts cases that strip state judges of authority? Will this Court exercise its supervisory powers against lower court judgments that deny enforcement of statutory injunctions rendering the enlistment contract and protective weight of the U.S. Constitution worthless? Additional Dependent Questions Presented For Review under 28 U.S. C. § 2101(e) Does res judicata of family law courts prohibit enforcing preemption in existing cases of federal disability benefits, post 1989? i

Docket Entries

2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Peter Barclay
Peter J. Barclay — Petitioner
Peter J. Barclay — Petitioner