No. 20-339
Jason Winer v. Coralys Negron, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure consumer-protection creditor-definition creditor-status de-facto-dealer district-court-jurisdiction state-law-claims Supplemental-jurisdiction unfair-trade-practices
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Trademark
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Trademark
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
No question identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR. REVIEW 1, Did the District Court err in exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs state law claims when the Defendant-Jason Winer was nota creditor pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1602(g) and 15 U.S.C, 1640? 2. Did the District Court err in finding that the Defendant Jason Winer was a “De Facto” car dealer and therefore subject to liability under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act? i Sep, 8 2020 10:57AM No. 2407 P. 3 Il.
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent Coralys Negron, et al. to respond filed.
2020-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Coralys Negron, et al.
Daniel S Blinn — Consumer Law Group, Inc., Respondent
Daniel S Blinn — Consumer Law Group, Inc., Respondent
Jason Winer
Lauren Hillelee Winer-Beck — Law Offices of Lauren Winer-Beck, Petitioner
Lauren Hillelee Winer-Beck — Law Offices of Lauren Winer-Beck, Petitioner