Whether the Massachusetts Appeals Court erred in its skeptical treatment of the petitioner's claims regarding the degree of destructiveness in his familial situation

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When the Massachusetts Appeals Court acknowledged potentially ina skeptical manner that Myers’s story was a “Biblical level story” and the degree of evil was leaving a “humongous stain on the universe” was it rubberstamping a failing on the part of courts to ascertain the degree of destructiveness in Myers’s familial situation, and due to its gravity the mindset of the entire United States of America? Was indeed, a perfect storm of evil engendered, which is truly of one of a kind Biblical proportions, both in ; terms of the calamity of the occurrence, and the opportunity for an equal and + Opposite reaction to occur? : 2. Like the Wright Brothers in their creation of a flying machine; is Myers bringing forth a vital understanding of the Tort for the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, the horror of abuse, and how such dynamics are profoundly at root in challenging modern day America? 3. In that Myers’ advocacy and the legal history of this case has unfolded over a twenty-four-year period, does Myers point to potentially corrupt practices of our divorce system in particular, and the gulf between American ideals of “liberty and justice for all;” and the current state of our legal system in America? Is this all shown through Myers’ inspiring, if imperfect journey? , i ‘