Whether or not democrat political bias to protect Sen. Kamala Harris from exposure to criminal prosecution existed

QUESTIONS PRESENTED a) Whether or not democrat political bias to protect Sen. Kamala Harris from exposure to criminal prosecution existed in USCAQ No. 1955357, enough to warrant an order for non-California based federal law enforcement investigation of criminal obstruction ignored by circuit jurists. ; b) Whether or not democrat political bias to protect Sen. Kamala Harris existed in USCAQ No. 19-55357, enough to warrant an order that the case be reheard in a different circuit. c) Whether, in termination of public employees with property interests, : the ninth circuit’s upholding of indefinite deprivation of all pay, well before the date of hearing offered as satisfying Loudermill, meets U.S. standards set by Loudermill. d) Whether or not proof that the ninth : circuit upheld summary judgment without reading the ‘Statement of Uncontroverted Material Facts’ and corresponding ‘Objections And Statements Of Dispute’, meets U.S. standards set by the Supreme Court. i EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES WARRANT EXERCISE OF THE COURT'S DISCRETIONARY POWERS, AND ADEQUATE RELIEF CANNOT BE OBTAINED IN ANY OTHER FORM OR FROM ANY OTHER COURT As described herein and in referenced circuit and U.S.D.C. filings of uncontroverted documentary . evidence, potential criminal exposure of U.S. Vice Presidential candidate, or Vice President, Kamala D. Harris exists upon any remand and reversal, as this ‘ extraordinary circumstance warrants use of the court’s discretionary power. No other court has the power to reverse the decision of the circuit court and remove the case to a different circuit under these extraordinary circumstances. { il