No. 20-360

David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. v. Shawn Jensen, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: attorneys-fees circuit-court-split circuit-split civil-rights fee-enhancement judicial-discretion lodestar-method prison-litigation-reform-act prisoner-litigation statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the PLRA leaves any room for a district court to enhance a fee award in prisoner cases beyond what it statutorily prescribes

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) prescribes precisely how to calculate an award of attorneys’ fees in prisoner cases. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d). This Court and several circuit courts have recognized that the PLRA’s fee formula, not the traditional lodestar method, applies and limits a district court’s discretion to award more than what it expressly authorizes. The Ninth Circuit, however, followed its own precedent and held that a district court retains the discretion to enhance a fee award, notwithstanding the PLRA’s limitations. The question presented is whether the PLRA leaves any room for a district court to enhance a fee award in prisoner cases beyond what it statutorily prescribes.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-18
Reply of petitioners David Shinn, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-08
Brief of respondents Shawn Jensen, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part; the time is extended to and including December 9, 2020.
2020-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 19, 2020 to December 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)

Attorneys

David Shinn, et al.
Nicholas D. AcedoStruck Love Bojanowski & Acedo, PLC, Petitioner
Shawn Jensen, et al.
David Cyrus FathiAmerican Civil Liberties Union, Respondent