Does a plaintiff remain 'Heck barred' from seeking §1983 relief when their conviction is partially reversed, vacating the only sentence imposed, but part of the conviction remains intact?

QUESTION PRESENTED . . RICHARD LOUIS ARNOLD PHILLIPS (Phillips), filing pro se, raises a ‘standing’ question heretofore unanswered by this Court. In Heck vHumphrey, 512 U.S. 477 at 486-487 (1994) this . ) Court held “[a] §1983 plaintiff must prove that the conviction or _ sentence has been reversed . | (Emphasis added.) _ Is a plaintiff 'Heck barred' from seeking §1983 relief, when , his conviction is partially reversed — thus vacating the only sentence imposed — but part of the conviction remains intact? i