What legal issues are being raised?

Questions Presented Statement of Appellate Jurisdiction 1 Appellate Jurisdiction is referred to power of Higher Court to revise lower's court decision, based on discovery and final ruling of the case. United States District Court has Appellate Jurisdiction authority to hear Criminal Bankruptcy Fraud cases under Federal Law. Subsequently, Bankruptcy Court can not overturn and overrule the Order of United States District Court entered in Petitioner's Bankruptcy Case, and the Order of the United States District Court would not be Newly Discovered Evidence. Whistleblower Protection Act I, The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b) (8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects whistleblowers (Petitioner) who provided and reported existance of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, regulations, mismanagement, gross waste of funds and abuse of authority, pursuant to foreclosure Fraud schemes of Petitioner's A. residence and B. business real estate assets in Charles Town WV under federal rules and program. \ 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of Certiorari to review the judgement of the State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. JURISDICTION The State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals entered Judgement on January 9, 2020 and The State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals denied petition for rehearing. ; SU R' U A. Loan Modification Repayment Program HAMP was denid anda protection petition was filed with Bankruptcy Court on February 21, 2012. The Federal Bankruptcy Court violates the whistleblower protection Act when the Court authorities take retaliatory action against petitioner by Foreclosing on whistleblower (Petitioner primary) Home, whereas Federal Court's ultimate intention was for the Office of Attorney General West Virginia to obtain State settlement and a class action settlement with Mortgage provider for other West Virginia property owners whose homes were foreclosed by the mortgage provider. Petitioner is not a lawyer and does not have legal attorney education. Reference to Memorandum Decision dated September 3, 2019, State of West Virginia, Supreme Court Appeals, the Summary Judgement Order dated August 24 2105 from chapter 7 bankruptcy are invalidated Pursuant to U.S. District Court Order dated January 7, 2017, Petitioner's Bankruptcy Case was dismissed, supported by FBI discovery of Bankruptcy Fraud by (retired) Trustee, and Creditor attorney Bill Dobbs, under Privacy and Secrecy (Sealed) Rules. Bankruptcy Court statement for 'Non payment Mortgage installments’ clause is designed to enforce liquidation of: petitioner's residence for class action settlements and other settlements, otherwise class action settlement and other settlements (penalties) entitlements would not be applicable and denied. 4 B. Federal Rules and Bankruptcy Rules were not followed and Bankruptcy Court err when liquidation of petitioner's business real estate was arranged by unforeseen action of Bankruptcy Court. without filing an appeal with US. District Court opposing the Order of Bankruptcy Court. United States Congress introduced Bill H.R. 2743, Automobile Dealers Economic Rights Restoration Act of 2009, to Restore the Economic Rights of Automobile Dealers and for other purposes, Vacating Bankruptcy Court and creditors forcing GM Dealerships out of business. On September 2, 2010 Petitioners : Automobile Dealership was foreclosed, and immediately $1.358 M Deficiency Lien Judgement was recorded, constituting FBI discovery and multiple violations, leading to U.S. Trustee resignation in December 2014, and certain attornies invlolved received disqualifications and fines. Petitioner as whistleblower, confirms liquidation and deficiency lien judgement of his dealership real esate were a fruadulant scheme to liquidate and foreclose on all other assets. Subsequently Complaint for temprorary and permanent injunction wer