Whether the Fourth Circuit properly upheld the district court's dismissal of Title VII claim

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether the Fourth Circuit properly upheld the district : court's dismissal of Title VII claim where the particular ; discriminatory practice had been identified and genuine issues of material fact that could change the outcome of the case were properly identified in Massenburg's Opposition? Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 56 (c) (1)(B), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-7 2) Whether my Title VII, 1991 amendment claim and 42 USC 1981 (b) legal claims were treated as separate, independent, , and distinct, as a matter of law and in the interest of adequate relief? Lytle v. Household Mfg., Inc., 494 U.S. 545 (1990) 3) Whether conflict exists within the Fourth Circuit where previous rulings have allowed claims "arising from" or "relating back" to the actionable EEOC intake questionnaire to serve as a “charge” for the purpose of establishing the limitations period. Fed R. of Civ. P. 15 (c) (1) (B), Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, 552 U.S. 389 (2008); 29 C.F.R. §§ 1601.9, 1601.12, 1626.3, 1626.6, 1626.8. : 7 me 4) Whether pro se persons should be issued Notices of , . Deficiency and afforded the same opportunity to make corrections to filings as is offered in the lower courts to persons trained in applying the law.