No. 20-408
Fredman Bros. Furniture Company, Inc. v. Bedgear, LLC
Relisted (2)
Tags: administrative-officers administrative-patent-judges appointments-clause constitutional-law inferior-officers judicial-review patent-law principal-officers separation-of-powers united-states
Key Terms:
Securities Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities Patent Trademark Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether administrative patent judges are 'principal' or 'inferior' Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether administrative patent judges are “principal” or “inferior” Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause.
Docket Entries
2021-06-23
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-21
Joint stipulation of dismissal under Rule 46.1 filed.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Memorandum of respondent in Response filed.
2020-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 30, 2020.
2020-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 29, 2020 to November 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 29, 2020)
Attorneys
Bedgear, LLC
Kenneth Lee Marshall — Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent
Kenneth Lee Marshall — Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent
Fredman Bros. Furniture Company, Inc.
Abran J. Kean — Erise IP, P.A., Petitioner
Abran J. Kean — Erise IP, P.A., Petitioner