No. 20-44

In Re David A. Golden

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: abuse-of-process civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process false-claims-act free-speech judicial-discretion rule-of-law standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 9th Circuit and Western Washington District Court have abused their discretion

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the 9 Circuit and Western Washington District Ct. have abused their ; discretion by dismissing Plaintiffs False : Claims complaint and appeal, with no hearing and no relief, after fraud and perjury , : were proven against USDOJ, and the crime : was proven by the 9 Circuit’s own case law? : 2. Whether the Contract Clause of the US Constitution (Art. I § 10 Clause 1) . : invalidates the False Claims Act and other state legislation (SB 5987)? 8. Whether the 1st, 5th, and 14t Amendments (and Art. I § 7 of the Washington State Constitution) invalidate this same legislation, if petitioner has already shown the Courts below that the challenged legislation (SB 5987) is obtained by the : Defendants’ abuse of the police state? . 4, Whether the 9th Circuit and the District Ct. have abused their discretion in refusing to apply a strict scrutiny standard to : petitioner’s complaint? 5. Whether the 9 Circuit and the District Ct. . have abused their discretion by refusing to award sanctions against USDOJ? , 6. Whether USDOJ, the 9 Circuit, and US : District Court are unable to perform their ministerial duty of enforcing the “Rule of ‘ , Law” because of political motivations? 1 ™) .

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-29
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-06
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)

Attorneys

In Re David A. Golden
David A. Golden — Petitioner
David A. Golden — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent