Jurisdiction-challenge

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The Court lacks subject matter and personal jurisdiction for the reasons below. 1. This Court, and all public offices, is defined under FRCP Rule 40) asa FOREIGN STATE, and as defined under TITLE 28-JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE The Sovereign Immunities Act (F’SIA) of 1976 is a United States law, codified at Title 28, 1330, 1332, 18910, 1441 (d), and 1602-1611, and is being jurisdictionally challenged, and “full disclosure” of the “true” jurisdiction of this Court has been asked but has stayed silent’? 2. Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statues at Large, this was passed to remove | . the people of the United States of America from the federal citizenship under the 14 amendment. Chapter | 249 (section 1), enacted July, 1868? 3. It_is the court’s responsibility to prove it has subject matter jurisdiction, and where a judge arbitrarily claims the court has jurisdiction. He is violating the defendant’s right to due process of the law. It is, in fact, the plaintiffs responsibility to prove, on the record. That jurisdiction exists, and jurisdiction can be challenged at any time, even years later, and even collaterally, as in a private administrative process, as was done herein. QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Continued It is the petitioner’s right to challenge jurisdiction, . and it is the duty to prove it exist. The respondent herein was given the opportunity — (multiple times) to put the facts of jurisdiction on the administrative record but acquiesced by tacit procuration to the fact that the constitutional and due process violatons alleged by the petitioner did, in fact occur and did, in fact, deprive the court of subject ‘matter jurisdiction, which is now the record before the court? | : | | 4. That it is not the prosecutor’s duty and obligation to provide ALL the facts that establish the court’s jurisdiction, and place them upon the record-even in a collateral attach against jurisdiction? . ‘