Whether the mere using of the word 'dismissed' is enough to make an order final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291

No question identified. : i JUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the mere using of the word “dismissed” is enough to make an order final within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291, where the without prejudice dismissal is the result of an anticipated settlement and allows the claim to continue at a later date if the settlement fails? 2. Whether the Court’s holding in Microsoft Corp. v. Baker, 187 S. Ct. 1702, 198 L. Ed. 2d 132 (2017) applies to a claim dismissed without prejudice? 3. Whether finality would attach to an order dismissing an action without prejudice where further developments might continue the claim?