No. 20-475
Stanley V. Campbell v. Eagle Force Holdings, LLC, et al.
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-contempt civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process judicial-procedure personal-jurisdiction sanctions
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a finding of civil contempt and the imposition of a sanction be sustained consistent with the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when the defense is expressly preserved and it is subsequently determined that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the claimed contemnor?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Can a finding of civil contempt and the imposition of a sanction be sustained consistent with the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when the defense is expressly preserved and it is subsequently determined that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the claimed contemnor?
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-22
Reply of petitioner Stanley V. Campbell filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-11
Brief of respondents Eagle Force Holdings, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-10-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 11, 2021.
2020-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 12, 2020 to January 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 12, 2020)
Attorneys
Eagle Force Holdings, LLC, et al.
Harold Mark Walter — Offit Kurman P.A., Respondent
Stanley V. Campbell
David Lee Finger — Finger & Slanina. LLC, Petitioner