No. 20-481
GE Capital Retail Bank v. Nyree Belton
Tags: bankruptcy-code debt-discharge federal-arbitration-act implied-repeal legal-procedure lower-court-confusion precedent statutory-discharge statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Arbitration Securities LaborRelations ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration Securities LaborRelations ClassAction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-03-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether provisions of the Bankruptcy Code providing for a statutorily enforceable discharge of a debtor's debts impliedly repeal the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether provisions of the Bankruptcy Code providing for a statutorily enforceable discharge of a debtor’s debts impliedly repeal the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
Docket Entries
2021-03-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-17
Reply of petitioner GE Capital Retail Bank filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-03
Brief of respondents Nyree Belton; Kimberly Bruce in opposition filed.
2021-01-04
Response Requested. (Due February 3, 2021)
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-24
Waiver of right of respondent Nyree Belton; Kimberly Bruce to respond filed.
2020-11-13
Brief of respondents Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A. in support filed.
2020-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A.
Joseph Robert Guerra — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
Joseph Robert Guerra — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
GE Capital Retail Bank
Matthew S. Hellman — Jenner & Block LLP, Petitioner
Matthew S. Hellman — Jenner & Block LLP, Petitioner
Nyree Belton; Kimberly Bruce
George Fortune Carpinello — Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Respondent
George Fortune Carpinello — Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Respondent