whether-the-court's-ruling-that-cell-phone-tower-location-data-and-interpretation-may-be-presented-by-an-unqualified-lay-witness-who-is-unable-to-answer-substantive-questions-on-cross-examination-without-parroting-violates-the-right-of-confrontation-and-cross-examination-established-by-the-6th-amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE COURT'S RULING THAT CELL PHONE TOWER LOCATION DATA AND INTERPRETATION MAY BE PRESENTED BY AN UNQUALIFIED LAY WITNESS WHO IS UNABLE TO ANSWER SUBSTANTIVE QUESTIONS ON CROSS-EXAMINATION WITHOUT PARROTING, VIOLATES THE RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION AND CROSS-EXAMINATION ESTABLISHED BY THE 67 AMENDMENT. IL. WHETHER THE COURT’S RULING FINDING A LACK OF STATE ACTION INA PREJUDICIAL PRETRIAL IDENTIFICATION INVOLVING ADMITTED POLICE “RECRUITMENT” OF LAY PERSONS CONTRAVENES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT. 2 List of All