No. 20-488
Sangeeta Bhargava v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection foreclosure forgery fraud judicial-process robo-signing standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are forgery and robo-signing one and the same?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Are forgery and robo-signing one and the same? 2. Is it a violation of due process and equal protection of the law to forbid a victim of forgery to use the judicial process in order to prevent his loss? 3. Is it a violation of due process and equal protection of law to require that a victim must wait until unlawful and fraudulent foreclosure, dispossession, and eviction are complete to seek redress in the Courts, particularly when this occurs under the auspices of and with the procedure of state law?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-13
Supplemental brief of petitioner Sangeeta Bhargava filed.
2020-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Sangeeta Bhargava
Thomas John Spielbauer — The Spielbauer Law Office, Petitioner
Thomas John Spielbauer — The Spielbauer Law Office, Petitioner