No. 20-50
Monica Voss v. Gregory G. Goode
Tags: 4th-amendment appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights clearly-established-right due-process fourth-amendment qualified-immunity section-1983 standing sua-sponte
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an appellate court may impute third-party actions to a § 1983 claimant as the basis for qualified immunity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether an appellate court may, sua sponte, impute the actions of a third party to a § 1983 claimant as the sole basis for extending qualified immunity for an unlawful Fourth Amendment seizure. 2. Whether the right to be free from arrest for disagreeing with a police officer, when the conduct consists of speech alone, is clearly established.
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-21
Brief of respondent Gregory G. Goode in opposition filed.
2020-08-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 21, 2020.
2020-07-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 20, 2020 to September 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 20, 2020)
Attorneys
Gregory G. Goode
Justin Carl Pfeiffer — Fort Bend County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Justin Carl Pfeiffer — Fort Bend County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Monica Voss
Randall Lee Kallinen — Kallinen Law PLLC, Petitioner
Randall Lee Kallinen — Kallinen Law PLLC, Petitioner