No. 20-5003
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-error constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-trial non-unanimous-verdict remand sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner's conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether petitioner’s conviction based upon a non-unanimous verdict violated the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? Whether this Court should grant the petitions, vacate the decision below and remand to the state courts for consideration of the constitutional issue in the first instance? i
Docket Entries
2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2020-12-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-16
Brief of respondent State of Louisiana in opposition filed.
2020-09-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 16, 2020.
2020-09-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 16, 2020 to November 16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-17
Response Requested. (Due September 16, 2020)
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-10
Waiver of right of respondent State of Louisiana to respond filed.
2020-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2020)
Attorneys
Richard Woods
State of Louisiana
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent