No. 20-5006
Manuel Olivas-Guevara v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abduction appeal appeal-timeliness base-offense-level civil-procedure dismissal district-court jurisdiction robbery sentencing-guidelines standing timeliness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the panel err by dismissing the appeal for timeliness?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) DID THE PANEL ERR BY DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR TIMELINESS? 2) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S DECISION TO INCREASE MISS MOSLEY’S BASE OFFENSE BY FOUR LEVELS PURSUANT TO U.S.S.G.§ 2B3.1(b)(4)(A) WHEN THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT SUPPORT A FINDING THAT AN “ABDUCTION” OCCURRED DURING THIS ROBBERY? ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2020)
Attorneys
Manuel Olivas-Guevara
Amy R Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
Amy R Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent