Whether the trial court erred and violated Mr. Pecoraro's rights to present a complete defense by prohibiting him from introducing Doris Murillo's and Nancy Rodriguez's statements about sex abuse allegations against DSR

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ae fe ete Coot oll ihe Yerolto Statutory ona K3cbrs ‘Ros De Belk ‘ato HevolQs See oly Cale A elod by Ev ronenusly Her Dadings Solely eal DsR's Vy chu! Abuse Rodings he cause the based Scott Snider’ ery Clear ond Conéise’ Statements to TTL, Wheeler the Trial Court Eered ond violated Mr. Pecobbers tens Yo present o. complete Tense When i+ Prahribited Him Grom _ntroducin Doris Muri\\o's ond M \ I ; Nancy Rodetguez Spe Ke about Sex " Ie how in a mony that DSR So Ores “hey Meh ty sak horde chro Sel e chi dren, Including of the Chi dven, STO? Wing about SOX WN Dont TIL. Whether the Triex\ Court mitted p,3 n eccor Sor not Tssutey Lrentirg Znstructtoss TrQocming dhe, ary Lt Goulet Only Cons gate Woalds Pot SS kere ok Cont alas soe snicker: For Core dooredive Pucgues ond Not oS gubstantive evident Ot Ne Peceddo's Guy A (G) By Ming Nahe Hck hope thes tee Violote hopecslelte Role i haropele WA aed Regpenenls ok id | UST oF PARTIES Kw All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . ; . Caf All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of . : all parties to ine proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this : petition is as follows: RELATED CASES ; Sheep V. Gallor 134 N.C App. 19,810 SE. 2A 702 cided) | Shede v. Bush, VOW NC. Nop. 9,585 SE. ad 715 CAM) Stote v. Cover 163 NC. App 197, BH SE. 2d 8) ; State v. Delsanto (7A NC. App. IB SE. 1a 70 5) : a Shed v. Ewell , 168 NC. Kpp!0%,b06 SE. 2A GU (aoe fas | Shite v. Hardy, 212, NC. Rep Me Te CEA anes) | Stote v. Kelly NENL. Ae Se aa eco) Shute v. Sakbogncebeiet QOIL NC. App. Lexis 7AS (Suly 19,2016) ‘