Whether the District Court and Court of Appeal erred in review of claim presented which clearly show ineffective assistance of counsel on both trial and appellate counsels?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the District, Court and Court of Appeal erred in review of claim presented which clearly zhow ineffective assistance of counsel on both trial and appellate counsels? Was there a Batson violation which was uachallenged by trial counsel? Did appeliste counsel failure to bring a Batson challenge on direct appeal violate Petitioner's right to effective assistance of counsel? Whether the District Court. and Court of Appeal erred in failing to recognize Petitioner's rights were violated when the confession was not suppressed? Is there prosecutorial misconduct resulting from “alternative facts’ offered by the prosecutor which were never shown by evidence? Was there a violation of Petitioner's rights when the prosecutor failed to preserve evidence ond also elicit testumony about the missmg evidence? Did the District Court and Court of Appeal err in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing in order to have the taking of testimony and gaining further evidence in support of his claims? , .