Whether it is unconstitutional that this pro se litigant (Petitioner) is denied the ability to be able to challenge the explicit correctness of a state official, Clerk of Superior Court of Wake County, Jennifer Knox, in her individual capacity, and under the color of her authority, which she denied him the North Carolina State Court System's appellate process

Question(s) Presented Whether it is unconstitutional that this pro se litigant (Petitioner) is denied the ability to be able to challenge the explicit correctness of a state official, Clerk of Superior Court of Wake County, Jennifer Knox, in her individual capacity, and under the color of her authority, which she denied him the North Carolina State Court System’s appellate process. Whether the clerk, the government, recklessly, intentionally (on purpose) wantonly, or with malice interfered with bias : the Petitioner’s due process of law, and equal protection of law rights. Whether the lower courts (US District and the US Court of Appeals) erred by not ; allowing the complaint process to follow through, essentially, not serving the respondents in this case; wherefore, was the decision below the standard of review in error as well as, unconstitutional. Whether the aforementioned violation of the due process of law and equal . protection of law, regulated by the Fifth and/or Fourteenth Amendment of the United States/North Carolina Constitution, limits the power of the federal and state government to violate, where it explicitly prohibits states from violating an . , individual’s rights of the due process of law and equal protection of law. 7 Whether axiomatic issues such as Superior Court transcripts, evaluation Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) evidential statement in No 19 (Final Order) in lui, NC Dept. Of Revenue and the Superior Court of Wake County, which records entries of the Motion for Reconsideration and the Notice of Appeal, and whether (entries Dec. 19, 2017 and Oct. 18, 2018) can be admitted as evidence. Whether NC Gen. Stat. Sec. 105-241.23 (a) and NC Gen. Stat. Sec. 105-237 is ambiguous or ; constitutional, whether there is a jurisdiction matter in the General Jurisdiction of the Superior Court, and whether Guthrie and Stanback conflict . Whether it is required, under Procedural Due Process No. 10, the US Court of Appeals prepare : written findings of fact and reasons for its decision. : ;