Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated

No question identified. : ¥ ot FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL THREE PART: ONE QUESTION Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated ' (“MCA”) in-100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress: (“JTV-DP-R”) on State Officials canceling Rick LUSSY Non-Lawyer Pro Se same docket caption Third Party Claim-Amended, Adding Parties to make moot: respondent’s buffaloing this court, not having done their homework to foist bogus remittitur “affirm Summary Dismissal,” $74,000 unnoticed, not argued “vexatious” litigant” in civil Rico Fraud to disgorge $1,258,877 public salaries, intentional vitiation of ministerial Oath Of Office contract without discretion for 100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress (“JTV-DP-R”) with no judgitis-bias. The American Bar Association (“ABA”) paid dues for unregistered lobbyist 24/7 sabotage. “Rule 10 serves a compelling government interest to reduce government corruption, 8-prior-County Appraisal now entering: August 18, 2020 election remedy: a fragile democratic check & balance. [B-part] Whether allow Ray v Blair to-suppress verdict. [C-part] Whether State Supreme Court officials transformed complaint into memorandum of law is itself a groundless non-binding: stare decisis pleading, no U.S. 11-Constitutional Issues, 27-Issues of First Impression for impeachment. And to certify statute challenge, 3-property tax appeals & destroyedMother’s Living Trust-To-Be etc. in one constitutional question. IT IS RESOLVED: A-B-C: moot is not to dismiss this infant case of no particularized: Remittitur-$74,000 “vexatious” litigant. WHEREBY: Order a second opinion by 100% JTV-DP-R to: “..rambling & incoherent screed against the Judiciary and the legal profession in general” to include captioned third party complaint & 2nd Amend 6 plus 16 additional total 22 parties deep pockets: to apply ministerial oaths of office-““MOOOF”) with no discretion. No ministerial lawyer exemption exists. The ABA is: (i) not competent 141.9-years for refusing professional & academic doctor true 100% JTV-DP-R experience before awarding juris doctor diplomas; (ii) not to require Old English hearsay stare decisis to vacate US Constitution: &-stigmatize RickLUSSY with no notice before August 18, 2020 election: & Gii) declare no ministerial lawyer exemption existing to benefit Pro Se Wade J. Dahood & Son Jeffrey Wade Dahood as officers of court. The rest of complicated legalisms can be decided another day: with joint Federal & State Judges in one-court. ii