Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated (MCA) in-100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress: ("JTV-DP-R")"

No question identified. : 5 « FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL THREE PART: QUESTION Whether to apply Federal Constitution: [A] bad speech to impeach hearsay-stare decisis with particularized legislated Montana Code Annotated (“MCA”) in-100-percent jury trial verdict due process redress: (“JTV-DP-R”) on State Officials canceling RickLUSSY Non-Lawyer Pro Se same docket caption Third Party Claim-Amended, Adding Parties to make moot: respondent’s buffaloing this court, not having done their homework to foist bogus remittitur “affirm Summary Dismissal,” $74,000 unnoticed “vexatious” litigant” that ignores clerk default for court $90,001 judgment favoring RickLUSSY in civil Rico Frauds on Pro Se Court by Pro Se Officials of Court: fact decision jury verdict not judgitis-bias of American Bar Association (“ABA”) paid dues for unregistered lobbyist sabotage. “Rule 10 serves a compelling government interest to reduce government corruption, 8-priorCounty Appraisal & 8/18/2020 election remedy: a fragile democratic check & balance. [B-part] Whether allow Ray v Blair to-suppress verdict. {C-part] Whether State Supreme Court officials transformed complaint into memorandum of law is itself a groundless non-binding: stare decisis pleading, no U.S. 11-Constitutional Issues, 27-Issues of First Impression for impeachment. And to certify statute challenge, 3-property tax appeals & destroyedMother’s Living Trust-To-Be etc. in one constitutional question. IT IS RESOLVED: A-B-C: moot is not to dismiss this infant case of no particularized: Remittitur$74,000 “vexatious” litigant. WHEREBY: Order a second opinion by 100% JTV-DP-R to: “..rambling & incoherent screed against the Judiciary and the legal profession in general” to include captioned third party complaint & 2.4 Amend 6 plus 16 additional total 22 parties deep pockets: default ($90,001) Judgment (Ms. Green) to apply ministerial oaths of office-(““MOOOF’) with no discretion. No ministerial lawyer exemption exists. The ABA is: (i) not competent 141.9-years for refusing professional & academic doctor true 100% JTV-DP-R experience before awarding juris doctor diplomas; (ii) not to require Old English hearsay stare decisis to vacate US Rick LUSSY with no notice for 8/18/2020 election; & (iii) declare no ministerial lawyer exemption exist to benefit Pro Se & officers of court. The rest of complicated legalisms can be decided another day: with joint Federal & State Judges in: Federal Case separate: Probate DP 18-31. di