No. 20-503

Tofig Kurbanov v. UMG Recordings, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: due-process foreign-citizen fourth-circuit-court internet-transactions personal-jurisdiction sovereignty website-operation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Copyright Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause is violated when a foreign citizen is subjected to personal jurisdiction based on operation of a website and minor internet-based transactions

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Court should grant certiorari to address whether the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution is violated when a foreign citizen is subjected to personal jurisdiction based entirely on: (1) his operation of a website that is popular both within the United States and worldwide, but which is not specifically aimed at the United States; and (2) minor internet-based and internet-initiated transactions entered into by the foreign citizen entirely from outside the United States. Certiorari should be granted because: (1) the lower courts are divided on this issue, an issue which this Court has not previously addressed; (2) the issue arises frequently; (3) a proper determination is crucial to respect the sovereignty of foreign nations and to avoid the widespread imposition of de facto national jurisdiction over the operators of any popular website wherever the internet is accessible; and (4) by reversing the district court’s dismissal of the action, the Fourth Circuit decided the issue incorrectly.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-05
Reply of petitioner Tofig Kurbanov filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-11
Rule 29.6 Statement filed with respect to the Respondents UMG Recordings, Inc., et al.
2020-12-08
Brief of respondents UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2020-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2020.
2020-11-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2020 to December 8, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Tofig Kurbanov
Evan M. Fray-WitzerCiampa Fray-Witzer, LLP, Petitioner
Evan M. Fray-WitzerCiampa Fray-Witzer, LLP, Petitioner
UMG Recordings, Inc., et al.
Ian Heath GershengornJenner & Block, Respondent
Ian Heath GershengornJenner & Block, Respondent