Whether a criminal defendant moving for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can satisfy his burden of proof by showing that his sentence may have been based on an unconstitutional provision and exceeds the statutory maximum under current law

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a criminal defendant moving for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, based on a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory enhancement provision, can satisfy his burden of proof by showing that his sentence may have been based on the unconstitutional provision, and his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum under current law. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no