No. 20-5045

In Re Daniel H. Jones

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-07-13
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-jurisdiction judicial-review mandamus standing state-law writ-of-mandamus writ-of-prohibition
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Would the issuance of a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus be justified

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L WOULD THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR MANDAMUS BE JUSTIFIED WHERE THE ‘ PETITIONER’S CIRCUMSTANCES COULD AID THIS COURT IN SUPERVISING AN APPELLATE COURT'S JURISDICTION? 7 WOULD THIS COURT BE JUSTIFIED GRANTING EITHER WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS WHERE ADEQUATE RELIEF CANNOT BE OBTAINED IN ANY OTHER FORM OR FROM ANY OTHER COURT? RESPONDENT PARTIES BY JOINER Statement of Parties; S.Ct. R. 14.1(b); For purpose of this action, the below listed parties shall be joined in cause by nature of their actions, as well as inactions while performing (or the failure to perform) their duties in their official capacities, and, under color of [state] law, being recognized as the real parties in interest, serving as the instruments to the petitioner's deprivations. . ; Therefore, shall be subjected to the penalties of prohibition and/or ; disciplinary actions by means of mandamus, 28 USC §1651, in performing their [judicial] acts or, the failure thereto, as so designated under 42 USC §1983; 18 . USC $242, and, TCA §29-21-313(a) via Tenn.Const, Art. |, &17, all while . performing their duties under color of .[“State’] law-State of Tennessee, who are Robert H. Montgomery, Jr. (former) Judge a , ; & James F. Goodwin, Jr. (current) Judge Sullivan County Criminal/Circuit Court ; 2nd Judicial District : 140 Blountville Bypass; P.O. Box 585 : Blountville, Tennessee. 37617-0585 : . : Norma McGee Ogle, James Curwood Witt, Jr. and D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.Judges; ; ; Knoxville Court of Criminal Appeals Eastern Division: Supreme Court Bldg. R. 200 505 Main St. / P.O. Box 444 Knoxville, Tennessee.37901. ; Harry S. Mattice, Jr. (Dist.Judge) ; U.S. District Court — Eastern Division U.S. Courthouse, Room 140 900 Georgia Avenue Chattanooga, Tennessee.37402

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-11-17
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-16
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-05-22
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2020)

Attorneys

Daniel Jones
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner
Daniel Henderson Jones — Petitioner