Whether the issuance of a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus would be justified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WOULD THE ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND/OR MANDAMUS BE JUSTIFIED WHERE THE PETITIONER’S CIRCUMSTANCES COULD AID THIS COURT IN SUPERVISING AN APPELLATE COURT'S JURISDICTION? WOULD THIS COURT BE JUSTIFIED GRANTING EITHER‘ WRIT. OF.PROHIBITION OR-MANDAMUS ° | WHERE ADEQUATE RELIEF CANNOT BE OBTAINED “ “INANY OTHER FORM OR FROM ANY OTHER COURT? | . RESPONDENT PARTIES . BY JOINER Statement of Parties; S.Ct. R. 14.1(b); ) For purpose of this action, the below listed parties shall be joined in cause by nature of their actions, as well as inactions while performing their duties in their official capacities, and, under color of [state] law, being recognized as the real parties in interest, serving as the instruments to the Appellant’s injuries. a, Therefore, shall be liable as:. entities of the State of Tennessee pursuant to TCA § 29-20-313(a)., who are CAROL L. MCCOY, Part-II, Chancellor, ELLEN a HOBBS LYLE, Part-ill, Chancellor, RUSSELL T. : PERKINS, DAVIDSON. ~ : COUNTY CHANCERY COURT; TWENTIETH : JUDICIAL DISTRICT; JIM PURVIANCE, _ . Re ne Executive Director; RICHARD MONTGOMERY, __. Chair, TENNESSEE:BOARD OF PAROLE; 404 James‘) er Robertson Parkway; Suite 1300 . Nashville, ; ne Bo 7 Each respondent’s cloak of sovereignty or otherwise lesser immunities 7 ; shall be waived by Acts of U.S. Congress, 42 USC §1983' as well “as State Legislation; Tennessee Constitution, Art.,§ 17.0 + * ae