No. 20-5057
Ledinson Chavez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advance-knowledge aggravated-identity-theft aiding-and-abetting criminal-law identity-theft jury-instruction knowledge-requirement rosemond-v-united-states sixth-circuit supreme-court-mandate
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the trial court's jury instruction on aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft comply with this Court's mandate in Rosemond v. United States, when the instruction did not advise the jury that Chavez had to have advance knowledge of the identity theft in order to be convicted as an aider and abettor?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the trial court's jury instruction on aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft comply with this Court's mandate in Rosemond v. United States?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Ledinson Chavez
Robert Kenyon Meyer — Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent