No. 20-5057

Ledinson Chavez v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advance-knowledge aggravated-identity-theft aiding-and-abetting criminal-law identity-theft jury-instruction knowledge-requirement rosemond-v-united-states sixth-circuit supreme-court-mandate
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the trial court's jury instruction on aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft comply with this Court's mandate in Rosemond v. United States?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the trial court’s jury instruction on aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft comply with this Court’s mandate in Rosemond v. United States, when the instruction did not advise the jury that Chavez had to have advance knowledge of the identity theft in order to be convicted as an aider and abettor? i LIST OF ALL THE PARTIES Petitioner, and defendant below, is Ledinson Chavez. Chavez's codefendants below were Claudia Lopez, Oskel Lezcano, Ariel BorregoHernandez, Sergio Betancourt, and Yuriesky Diaz Rodriguez. Respondent is the United States of America.

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Ledinson Chavez
Robert Kenyon MeyerDinsmore & Shohl LLP, Petitioner
Robert Kenyon MeyerDinsmore & Shohl LLP, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent