No. 20-5058

Randy Estevez v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process felony-enhancement firearm-possession jury-instructions jury-unanimity sentencing sentencing-reasonableness u-s-sentencing-guidelines unanimity
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in not instructing the jury that it should be unanimous on the date and location of his alleged possession of the firearm?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the district court erred in not instructing the jury that it should be unanimous on the date and location of his alleged possession of the firearm? 2. Whether there was insufficient evidence to support the four-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. §2K2.1(B)(6) that Estevez used a firearm in connection with another felony? 3. Whether the sentence of 100 months incarceration was substantively unreasonable? ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDINGS The Petitioner in this Court is Randy Estevez. The Respondent is the United States of America. iti

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Randy Estevez
Bruce Robert BryanBruce R. Bryan, Esq., Petitioner
Bruce Robert BryanBruce R. Bryan, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent