No. 20-5067

James A. Riggs v. Jay Cassady, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appeals-process civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review post-conviction-relief procedural-deficiency standing
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 4th Circuit Court displayed an abuse of its enumerated power, in contravention of the 10th Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) WEAINER a Pekho NER, Now a Convicted STATEPri son eR, pas & StandinarChallENEE Hic Connietion Upow the. rounds thet the 44th Cireut (Court displayed! OW Blodew obuse of thar enuwversted Power, , Bey INeonerawt with +he 10% Const tipwal _f AmendmenT Resulhtng In a Ween tu| Gyacturbated cuttome | 2) Weather Z, the Petthoner wit demed of my Sth amd (pth Consttiona| Amenc] ments Rights Upon the nenligeneerof the Stutes by way of fa luee +o provide noteffreatt an of four separate otutia hearings. | 2) Wether f have been qrantedL dhe process, In artoridunee wet the Consttion Amendment £4) any amd all appeats in whieh & made in reguest to diamieg a(| thames to dismiss all Charges | or af the very least grant a pew tral dnt 0 any oF the G2 meerits brought forth Against me. a+ my oriainel trial, . ‘

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent Jay Cassady to respond filed.
2020-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2020)

Attorneys

James Riggs
James A. Riggs — Petitioner
James A. Riggs — Petitioner
Jay Cassady
Julie Marie BlakeOffice of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent
Julie Marie BlakeOffice of the Missouri Attorney General, Respondent