No. 20-5071

David P. Moran v. Florida

Lower Court: Florida
Docketed: 2020-07-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process fourteenth-amendment motion-preservation preservation-of-error standing trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is Fla. Stat. 924.051(1)(b) unconstitutional due to conflict with 14th Amendment due-process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Is Fla. Stat. 924.051(1)(b) unconstitutional on it's face due to it's conflict with the due process clause of the U.S. Const. 14th Amend.? 2. Should a motion not being ruled on by the trial judge be automatically . preserved for appellate review with or without an objection being offered? 3. Should a motion not being ruled on by the trial judge be automatically . preserved for appellate review when the issue the motion's contents of is material to trial? a i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2020)

Attorneys

David P. Moran
David P. Moran — Petitioner
David P. Moran — Petitioner