No. 20-5076
Jorge Aaron Ceja-Valdez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-usc-1101 california-penal-code categorical-approach criminal-law deportation-grounds immigration-law statutory-interpretation theft-offense
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a conviction under California Penal Code § 211 categorically qualify as a generic 'theft' offense for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does a conviction under California Penal Code § 211 categorically qualify as a generic "theft" offense for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G)?
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Jorge Ceja-Valdez
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent