1) Can a prisoner's 1st amendment right to correspondence be totally "revoked" without a hearing or due process? This included all religious mail, educational mail, and some legal mail while the prisoner was in solitary confinement.

2) Should a state actor be granted qualified immunity for the mail block stated in question 1, especially when he wrote a false report to get that mail block?

3) If a person allegedly sends out unwanted mail, is there a "reasonable relationship" under the "Turner Test" to block all his incoming mail?

4) Does the "Turner Test" apply to outgoing mail?

5) If a prisoner in solitary confinement has no access to religious gatherings, is it a violation to block all his incoming and outgoing religious mail?

6) Can a federal district court ignore a rule 56(c)(2) FRCP challenge to a motion for summary judgement?

7) If a letter forms the basis of a prison disciplinary report, and the prisoner disputes the contents of the letter, was his due process rights violated when the prison refused to produce the letter at his disciplinary hearing, which lead to 6 months of disciplinary solitary confinement?

Can a prisoner's 1st amendment right to correspondence be totally revoked without a hearing or due process?