No. 20-5086
Johnny Mack Sketo Calhoun v. Florida
IFP
Tags: brady-violation cumulative-error cumulative-error-analysis exculpatory-evidence giglio-violation ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel strickland-standard strickland-test trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel's failure to investigate and present exculpatory evidence, which significantly undermines the State's evidence is deficient performance that results in prejudice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether trial counsel’s failure to investigate and present exculpatory evidence, which significantly undermines the State’s evidence is deficient performance that results in prejudice? 2. Whether a state court is required to conduct a cumulative error analysis of violations of Brady, Giglio, and/or Strickland? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-28
Reply of petitioner Johnny Mack Sketo Calhoun filed.
2020-08-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 18, 2020.
2020-08-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2020 to August 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-18
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Johnny Mack Sketo Calhoun
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent