No. 20-5091
Phillip Shawn Horton v. United States
Tags: vacate the judgement and remand for reconsiderati 4th-amendment case-reconsideration certiorari criminal-procedure Davis-remand davis-v-united-states judicial-remand precedent-application remand search-and-seizure Supreme-Court-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgement and remand for reconsideration in light of Davis v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L. Whether this Court should grant certiorari, vacate the judgement and remand for reconsideration in light of Davis v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020)? ii
Docket Entries
2020-11-06
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-10-05
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Davis</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 589 U. S. ___ (2020) (<i>per curiam</i>).
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-14
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Phillip Shawn Horton
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent