No. 20-5095
Jethro L. Clairvoyant v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process equal-protection ineffective-counsel jury-instructions martinez-claim reversals similarly-situated-defendants state-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner was denied due process and equal protection
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE ‘ LAW BY THE STATE COURT'S REFUSAL TO RESERVE THE CONVICTIONS FROM THE STATE COURT'S ERRONEOUS JURY INSTRUCTIONS. WHERE OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED DEFENDANTS WERE GRANTED REVERSALS? 2. WHETHER PETITIONER IS ENTIITLED TO THE HOLDING IN MARTINEZ V. RYAN, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), WHEN HE RAISES -.A SUFFICIENT CLAIM OF DEPRIVATION OF EFFECTIVE COUNSEL WHO FAILED TO OBJECT TO THE PROSECUTOR MISSTATING THE LAW? 1
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-27
Waiver of right of respondent Florida Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)
Attorneys
Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent